ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Renal clear cell carcinoma (RCC) is a malignant tumor of the genitourinary system with a predilection for males. The most common metastatic sites are the lung, liver, lymph nodes, contralateral kidney or adrenal gland, however, skin metastasis has only been seen in 1.0%-3.3% of cases. The most common site of skin metastasis is the scalp, and metastasis to the nasal ala region is rare. CASE SUMMARY: A 55-year-old man with clear cell carcinoma of the left kidney was treated with pembrolizumab and axitinib for half a year after surgery and was found to have a red mass on his right nasal ala for 3 mo. The skin lesion of the patient grew rapidly to the size of 2.0 cm × 2.0 cm × 1.2 cm after discontinuation of targeted drug therapy due to the coronavirus disease 2019 epidemic. The patient was finally diagnosed with skin metastasis of RCC in our hospital. The patient refused to undergo surgical resection and the tumor shrank rapidly after resuming target therapy for 2 wk. CONCLUSION: It is rare for an RCC to metastasize to the skin of the nasal ala region. The tumor size change of this patient before and after treatment with targeted drugs shows the effectiveness of combination therapy for skin metastasis.
ABSTRACT
SESSION TITLE: Using Imaging for Diagnosis Case Posters SESSION TYPE: Case Report Posters PRESENTED ON: 10/19/2022 12:45 pm - 01:45 pm INTRODUCTION: Immunotherapy is now a standard of care in solid-tumor oncology following the approvals of CTLA-4 and PD-1 inhibitors. Belzutifan, a small-molecule HIF-2a inhibitor, has recently gained FDA-approval for the treatment of advanced von Hippel-Lindau (VHL) associated renal cell carcinomas. CASE PRESENTATION: A 63-year-old female presented to our hospital with a one-day history of progressive dyspnea. Medical history is significant for metastatic renal cell carcinoma with pulmonary metastasis. Family and social history were noncontributory. Her cancer diagnosis was established in 2019 and had undergone cytoreductive nephrectomy and treatment with axitinib/pembrolizumab. As she had little improvement with immunotherapy, she was enrolled in a clinical trial at Memorial Sloan Kettering. Due to further disease progression, she was transitioned to lenvatinib/everolimus, though the treatment was discontinued due to anorexia and worsening pulmonary symptoms. Further work up revealed that she had ERG, MPL, VHL gene mutations. Thus, she was started on belzutifan two weeks prior to her presentation. Initial vitals were significant for hypoxia on room air that recovered with high flow nasal cannula (40L/80%). Physical examination was remarkable for severe respiratory distress with coarse breath sounds bilaterally. Laboratory studies revealed an acute leukocytosis with a neutrophilic prominence and a chronic metabolic alkalosis. COVID, flu PCR were negative. Chest x-ray demonstrated diffuse bilateral reticulonodular opacities. CTA revealed innumerable pulmonary nodules with areas of mass-like consolidation and a loculated left-sided pleural effusion. She was covered with azithromycin/ceftriaxone along with high-dose steroids and was admitted to the stepdown unit for further management. While in stepdown, she had a left PleurX catheter placed given her large effusion which was complicated by bloody output that required one unit of blood. Despite high-dose steroids, she had persistent hypoxia. As she remained unstable, goals of care discussions were held, which ultimately led to a change in code status to comfort measures. All aggressive measures were discontinued. She was started on comfort medications and ultimately passed away. DISCUSSION: Currently, neoplasms associated with VHL mutations are managed surgically to minimize the risk of metastatic disease. Nearly 70% of all patients with VHL mutations will develop renal cell carcinomas which means most patients undergo numerous surgical procedures. HIF-2a inhibition therefore offers an effective alternative that could reduce surgical burden and offer a new approach to management of VHL-associated disease. However due to its new approval, several adverse effects have yet to be documented. CONCLUSIONS: We report the only known case of Belzutifan-induced hypersensitivity pneumonitis and hope this case will become a useful contribution to the literature. Reference #1: Jonasch E, Donskov F, Iliopoulos O, Rathmell WK, Narayan VK, Maughan BL, Oudard S, Else T, Maranchie JK, Welsh SJ, Thamake S, Park EK, Perini RF, Linehan WM, Srinivasan R;MK-6482-004 Investigators. Belzutifan for Renal Cell Carcinoma in von Hippel-Lindau Disease. N Engl J Med. 2021 Nov 25;385(22):2036-2046. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2103425. PMID: 34818478. DISCLOSURES: No relevant relationships by Garrett Fiscus No relevant relationships by Niala Moallem No relevant relationships by Raj Parikh
ABSTRACT
Background: ACC is a heterogeneous neoplasm and there is no standard treatment for patients (pts) with recurrent/metastatic (R/M) disease. Vascular endothelial growth factor receptor inhibitors (VEGFRi) are frequently used to treat R/M ACC rendering mostly disease stabilization. ACC is resistant to PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors (PD-L1i), consistent with its low mutational burden and uninflamed immune microenvironment. We hypothesized that the immunomodulatory role of VEGFRi (axitinib) would enhance PD-L1i (Avelumab) activity and be a more effective therapy for R/M ACC. Methods: Eligible pts had R/M ACC with radiological or clinical progression within 6 months (mos) of enrollment. Treatment consisted of axitinib 5 mg PO bid and avelumab 10 mg/Kg IV every 2 weeks. Primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR) per RECIST 1.1;secondary endpoints included duration of response (DOR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and toxicity. Simon 2-stage design was applied to test the null hypothesis of ORR ≤ 5% versus the alternative ORR ≥ 20%;≥ 4 responses out of 29 pts was required to reject the null hypothesis. Results: 41 pts enrolled from 07/24/19 to 06/29/ 21;28 were evaluable for the primary endpoint (7 screen failures, 6 evaluable for safety only due to loss of insurance/logistics issues related to COVID-19 pandemic);16 pts were treated in first-line. Mutation data was available for 23 of 28 evaluable pts;7 had NOTCH1 activating mutations. The ORR was 17.9% (5/28, 95%CI: 6.1-36.9%). One response was unconfirmed (pt progressed in non-target lesions 2 mos after achieving a PR), for a confirmed ORR of 14.3% (95%CI: 4-32.7%). The median follow-up time for the 15 alive pts was 11.6 mos (min-max: 7.7-29.2 mos). Median PFS was 7.2 mos (95%CI: 3.7-11.7 mos) with a 6-mos PFS rate of 57% (95%CI: 41-79%). Median OS was 17.4 mos (95%CI: 13-NA). 5 pts remain on therapy, 2/5 with a PR. The median DOR for the 5 responders was 5.2 mos (95% CI: 3.7-NA mos). The most common treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) were fatigue (62%), hypertension (32%), diarrhea (29%), and stomatitis (29%). Serious TRAEs occurred in 8 (24%) pts, all grade 3 and manageable. 4 (15%) pts discontinued avelumab and 9 (32%) underwent axitinib dose reduction due to toxicity. Conclusions: The study reached its primary endpoint with ≥ 4 responses out of 28 evaluable pts (ORR of 17.8%;confirmed ORR of 14.3%). The ORR and 6- mos PFS rate of 57% with axitinib and avelumab compares favorably with single agent axitinib and warrants further study of the combination.
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVE: Nephrectomy and venous thrombectomy is a challenging procedure with potential morbidity and mortality. Despite the increasing use of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) in the management of advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC), data regarding the outcomes of venous thrombectomy following ICI is limited. We evaluated the feasibility and perioperative outcomes of nephrectomy and venous thrombectomy following ICIs. METHODS: Patients with locally advanced or metastatic RCC with venous thrombus undergoing nephrectomy following ICI therapy were evaluated in four high-volume US academic centers between June 2017 and June 2021. Clinical data, perioperative outcomes, and 90-day complications were recorded. RESULTS: Out of 79 patients who received post-ICI nephrectomy, 27 had venous thrombus. Median (IQR) age was 64 (55-71) years. ICI regimens were Nivolumab ± Ipilimumab (n=19), and Pembrolizumab± Axitinib (n=8). Nephrectomy was indicated following either a good clinical response to ICI (n=24) or as a palliative surgery (n=3). Venous thrombi levels are shown in Table-1. Among all patients, 26 (96%) underwent radical and 1 (4%) partial nephrectomy;12 (44.5%) open, 12 (44.5%) robotic and 3 (11%) laparoscopic. One robotic case converted electively to open. Vascular procedures included renal vein thrombectomy (n=6), IVC thrombectomy and primary repair (n=19), IVC patch repair (n=1), and suprarenal cavectomy (n=1). No intraoperative complications were reported. Nine patients showed no viable tumor in the thrombus, of whom 2 had complete response in the primary tumor as well (ypT0N0). 90-day complication rate was 33% (n=9), with 8 patients (30%) requiring readmission (Table-2). One death was reported within 90 days due to COVID-19 infection. CONCLUSIONS: Nephrectomy and venous thrombectomy following systemic immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy is feasible. One third of patients show no viable tumor in the thrombus. Larger studies are needed to predict pathological response.
ABSTRACT
Introduction: Incidence rates of renal-cell carcinoma have increased by more than a third within the last decade.1 VEGF inhibitors were the mainstay of treatment options in the first-line setting up until the NICE Technology Appraisal in 2020 recommended avelumab plus axitinib combination for untreated advanced RCC within the Cancer Drugs Fund.2 Since then, the use of immunotherapy plus oral VEGF inhibitor has showed promising results in patients with good, intermediate or poor risk disease. The Javelin 101 trial demonstrated progression-free survival was significantly longer with avelumab plus axitinib than with the standard of care, sunitinib, however adverse events occurred in 99.5% of patients who received the combination.3 The complexity lies with the overlap of immunotherapy and VEGF inhibitor adverse events and how to distinguish between the two in order to effectively manage these. With the introduction of pharmacy-led clinics, a major role of the pharmacist has been toxicity management in this cohort of patients. Aim and objectives: To compare and quantify the incidence of common adverse events and resulting dose modifications and treatment delays between the Javelin 101 trial with a real-world cohort of patients treated at Mount Vernon Cancer Centre, MVCC. Methods: Electronic health records were retrospectively scrutinized for all patients who received avelumab plus axitinib treatment at MVCC between June 2020 and June 2021. Patients who commenced treatment in June 2021 or who had 1 cycle or less of treatment were excluded. Clinical data based on dose delays, adverse events and dose modifications was collected, collated and analysed. Results: A total of 36 patients were analysed and 97.2% experienced an adverse event. 52.7% of patients needed dose modifications of axitinib and 5.5% had a dose escalation. Comparatively the Javelin study had 42.2% of patients requiring a dose reduction and 10.8% received 1 dose escalation. Avelumab is given as a flat dose. Most common reasons for dose reductions at MVCC included diarrhoea, stomatitis, rash and palmar-plantar erythema. Dose reductions and dose delays are standard practice for managing toxicities from avelumab and axitinib. Hypothyroidism was the most common adverse event, affecting 50% of patients studied (Female 70%: Male 42%). Patients experienced diarrhoea (42%) throughout their treatment which is largely attributed to axitinib. This was effectively managed through dose delays. Due to Covid-19, patients were reviewed in telephone clinics hence hypertension primarily managed by GPs;hence dose delays due to elevated BP were not seen. Dyspnoea and cough symptoms required further investigation. A significant number of patients ended up with Covid-19 infections resulting in treatment delays. Others had pulmonary embolisms and quickly resumed their treatment once on anticoagulation. Some patients with transaminitis were managed with long term steroids resulting in extended dose delays. Conclusions: The occurrence of the adverse events in real-world data significantly differed in some areas to the Javelin 101 trial. The lack of face-to-face reviews due to the Covid-19 pandemic may have contributed to this. The non-medical prescriber pharmacist led clinics played a major role in managing avelumab and axitinib adverse events.
ABSTRACT
Background: The KEYNOTE 426 trial demonstrated pem 200mg plus axi twice daily (bd) is effective in aRCC. Pharmacokinetic modelling of pem 400 mg every six weeks demonstrated similar observed exposures to pem 200 mg every three weeks. In NHS Scotland, pem6w + axi was used during the COVID-19 pandemic to reduce hospital visits and for pts' convenience. Here, we evaluate the RWE of pem6w + axi in aRCC. Methods: Electronic medical records of pts on pem6w + axi between 1 May 2020 & 1 Jun 2021 in two large cancer centers in Scotland were analyzed retrospectively for pts' characteristics, treatment related adverse events (TRAE) and efficacy. Results: Total of 93 pts were identified (Table). At data cut off of 8 Sep 2021, with a median follow-up of 7 months (mo) (interquartile range (IQR) 5 mo;range 0-15 mo), 73 pts (78%) were alive. Clinician assessed radiological response was evaluable in 87 pts. Overall response rate (ORR) including partial response + complete response was noted in 49 pts (56%) with median time to response of 80 days (d). Clinical benefit rate including pts with ORR and stable disease was seen in 72 pts (83%). At data cut off, 24 pts (26%) had progressed with a median time to progression of 117 d (IQR: 85d). Median overall and progression free survival were not reached and follow-up continues. 81 pts (87%) had any grade and 28 pts (30%) had grade 3/4 TRAE. Immune related AE (irAE) of any grade occurred in 60 pts (65%) and grade 3/4 in 19 pts (20%). Common grade 3/4 irAE were transaminitis (10%), colitis (8%), nephritis (2%) and skin (2%). 28 (30%) and 14 pts (15%) respectively required steroids and hospitalisation for irAE with median hospital stay 6 d (range: 2-43 d). 10 pts suffered a second irAE requiring steroids and 5 pts had a second hospital stay with median hospital stay of 6 d. Any grade AE and grade 3/4 AE related to axi occurred in 67 (72%) and 14 pts (15%) respectively. Axi dose was escalated from 5mg to 7mg bd in 12 pts (13%), reduced to 3mg bd in 35 pts (38%) and 2mg bd in 10 pts (11%). 21pts (23%) on Pem and 15pts (16%) on axi discontinued treatment due to TRAE. Conclusions: Our RWE demonstrates that pem6w + axi appears to have comparable safety profile to pem 200mg + axi reported in Keynote 426 study, with the added benefits of less frequent hospital visits. Further follow up continues for efficacy in this heterogeneous pts population. Pt characteristics, total=93 (%).